3.0 years ago
opheevallee
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
872
views
0
votes
1
reply
1.6k
views
updated 5.3 years ago by
Rory Stark
★
5.2k
•
written 5.4 years ago by
annika-helverson
•
0
3
votes
3
replies
4.6k
views
0
votes
0
replies
1.2k
views
3
votes
7
replies
2.2k
views
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
8.0 years ago
rebecca.spokony
•
0
1
vote
16
replies
4.2k
views
8.1 years ago • updated 8.0 years ago
mmarins
•
0
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Answer: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
You could try the followings:
> design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + group)
> contrast <- makeContrasts(PvsL = 0.5*(L.pregnant + B.pregnan…
Answer: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
maripane
•
0
Thanks Michael, so is there a way to work around this issue?
Can I somehow make sure I can remove this batch effects without overcorrecti…
Comment: CleanUpRNAseq with a GTF that is missing mitochondria annotation data
by
rcreed
•
0
The updated version worked well on my data. Thank you!
Votes
Awards
• All
Locations
• All
United Kingdom, 5 minutes ago
France, 9 minutes ago
United States, 10 minutes ago
Germany, 28 minutes ago
Algeria, 1 hour ago
United Kingdom, 5 minutes ago
France, 9 minutes ago
United States, 10 minutes ago
Germany, 28 minutes ago
Algeria, 1 hour ago
Traffic: 744 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6