2.6 years ago
hamiltond
▴
10
0
votes
0
replies
963
views
1
vote
5
replies
2.0k
views
0
votes
6
replies
1.9k
views
updated 8.1 years ago by
Jiang, Mike
★
1.3k
•
written 8.1 years ago by
peter.rubbens
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
updated 8.4 years ago by
Jiang, Mike
★
1.3k
•
written 8.4 years ago by
niklaus.hurlimann
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
1.7k
views
9.9 years ago
AJC
▴
10
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Issues with BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm39 and generating motif matrix in Signac (
by
Paul
•
0
You are an absolute lifesaver, thank you so much for the clarification!
Answer: Issues with BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm39 and generating motif matrix in Signac (
by
James W. MacDonald
67k
The `EnsDb.Mmusculus.v79` package is mm38, not mm39. If you want a current `EnsDb`, use `AnnotationHub`
```
> library(AnnotationHub)
>…
Comment: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
Michael Love
42k
I'm adding my comment to the threaded section ...
I don't have any suggestions here but whatever method you're using is not appropriate up…
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
880
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Awards
• All
Popular Question to
Anna
▴
20
Popular Question to
Talip
▴
10
Popular Question to
alexandre.blais
▴
50
Locations
• All
United States, 4 minutes ago
United States, 7 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 11 minutes ago
United States, 17 minutes ago
France, 18 minutes ago
United States, 4 minutes ago
United States, 7 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 11 minutes ago
United States, 17 minutes ago
France, 18 minutes ago
Traffic: 950 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6