3.1 years ago
Mallory
▴
10
1
vote
1
reply
982
views
3
votes
2
replies
3.2k
views
updated 7.7 years ago by
Aaron Lun
★
28k
•
written 7.7 years ago by
what_theheck24
•
0
27
votes
7
replies
16k
views
updated 8.1 years ago by
Simon Anders
★
3.8k
•
written 8.1 years ago by
mbeckste
▴
30
16
votes
5
replies
7.9k
views
updated 9.0 years ago by
Gordon Smyth
51k
•
written 9.0 years ago by
komal.rathi
▴
120
8
votes
5
replies
5.6k
views
9
votes
4
replies
3.1k
views
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Answer: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
You could try the followings:
> design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + group)
> contrast <- makeContrasts(PvsL = 0.5*(L.pregnant + B.pregnan…
Answer: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
maripane
•
0
Thanks Michael, so is there a way to work around this issue?
Can I somehow make sure I can remove this batch effects without overcorrecti…
Comment: CleanUpRNAseq with a GTF that is missing mitochondria annotation data
by
rcreed
•
0
The updated version worked well on my data. Thank you!
Votes
Awards
• All
Locations
• All
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
France, 19 minutes ago
Germany, 20 minutes ago
The Netherlands, 20 minutes ago
Ireland, 39 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
France, 19 minutes ago
Germany, 20 minutes ago
The Netherlands, 20 minutes ago
Ireland, 39 minutes ago
Traffic: 785 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6