7.1 years ago
nrubinstein
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
696
views
3
votes
3
replies
2.0k
views
1
vote
1
reply
2.1k
views
updated 8.5 years ago by
Steve Lianoglou
★
13k
•
written 8.5 years ago by
christopher.clarskon15
▴
20
0
votes
0
replies
957
views
0
votes
0
replies
1.1k
views
0
votes
1
reply
978
views
0
votes
0
replies
1.7k
views
9.5 years ago
carleshf
▴
10
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
Michael Love
42k
I'm adding my comment to the threaded section ...
I don't have any suggestions here but whatever method you're using is not appropriate up…
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Answer: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
You could try the followings:
> design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + group)
> contrast <- makeContrasts(PvsL = 0.5*(L.pregnant + B.pregnan…
Answer: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
maripane
•
0
Thanks Michael, so is there a way to work around this issue?
Can I somehow make sure I can remove this batch effects without overcorrecti…
Votes
Awards
• All
Popular Question to
Anna
▴
20
Popular Question to
Talip
▴
10
Popular Question to
alexandre.blais
▴
50
Locations
• All
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 minute ago
France, 9 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
EMBL Heidelberg, 14 minutes ago
Germany, 42 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 1 minute ago
France, 9 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
EMBL Heidelberg, 14 minutes ago
Germany, 42 minutes ago
Traffic: 800 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6