6.3 years ago
nilaycan
•
0
0
votes
1
reply
720
views
0
votes
6
replies
2.1k
views
0
votes
0
replies
1.2k
views
7.4 years ago
parker
•
0
0
votes
6
replies
2.2k
views
updated 7.6 years ago by
Peter Hickey
▴
740
•
written 7.7 years ago by
brandon.le
•
0
1
vote
3
replies
1.5k
views
0
votes
3
replies
2.8k
views
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Issues with BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm39 and generating motif matrix in Signac (
by
Paul
•
0
Unfortunately I've updated my code with the newest GRCm39 genome, and yet I am still getting the same error.... Is there anything else I ca…
Comment: WGCNA with TPM tables
by
ATpoint
★
4.5k
WGCNA is not a Bioconductor package, but generally:
If you want to do serious analysis then find the raw data. There is no guarantee what …
Answer: Issues with BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm39 and generating motif matrix in Signac (
by
James W. MacDonald
67k
The `EnsDb.Mmusculus.v79` package is mm38, not mm39. If you want a current `EnsDb`, use `AnnotationHub`
```
> library(AnnotationHub)
>…
Comment: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
Michael Love
42k
I'm adding my comment to the threaded section ...
I don't have any suggestions here but whatever method you're using is not appropriate up…
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
880
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Votes
Awards
• All
Popular Question to
Anna
▴
20
Popular Question to
Talip
▴
10
Popular Question to
alexandre.blais
▴
50
Locations
• All
United States, 2 minutes ago
United States, 9 minutes ago
France, 18 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 19 minutes ago
Nigeria, 27 minutes ago
United States, 2 minutes ago
United States, 9 minutes ago
France, 18 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 19 minutes ago
Nigeria, 27 minutes ago
Traffic: 708 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6