7.0 years ago
siinemselvi
•
0
0
votes
4
replies
2.5k
views
3
votes
3
replies
3.6k
views
2
votes
1
reply
4.7k
views
updated 8.0 years ago by
James W. MacDonald
67k
•
written 8.0 years ago by
Lna
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
1.9k
views
updated 9.4 years ago by
Martin Morgan
25k
•
written 9.4 years ago by
filip.roudnicky
•
0
3
votes
11
replies
6.6k
views
9.6 years ago
meeta.mistry
▴
30
3
votes
11
replies
15k
views
updated 9.6 years ago by
Dan Tenenbaum
★
8.2k
•
written 9.6 years ago by
daniil.sarkisyan
▴
10
2
votes
2
replies
2.1k
views
updated 10.0 years ago by
James W. MacDonald
67k
•
written 10.0 years ago by
AJC
▴
10
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Answer: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
You could try the followings:
> design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + group)
> contrast <- makeContrasts(PvsL = 0.5*(L.pregnant + B.pregnan…
Answer: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
maripane
•
0
Thanks Michael, so is there a way to work around this issue?
Can I somehow make sure I can remove this batch effects without overcorrecti…
Comment: CleanUpRNAseq with a GTF that is missing mitochondria annotation data
by
rcreed
•
0
The updated version worked well on my data. Thank you!
Votes
Awards
• All
Locations
• All
France, 9 minutes ago
Germany, 13 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
Australia, 29 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 32 minutes ago
France, 9 minutes ago
Germany, 13 minutes ago
United Kingdom, 14 minutes ago
Australia, 29 minutes ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia, 32 minutes ago
Traffic: 784 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6