updated 4.8 years ago by
James W. MacDonald
67k
•
written 4.8 years ago by
alex
•
0
0
votes
2
replies
1.4k
views
0
votes
0
replies
761
views
7.6 years ago
indranipoddar
•
0
3
votes
2
replies
1.7k
views
updated 8.3 years ago by
Martin Morgan
25k
•
written 8.3 years ago by
Mehmet Ilyas Cosacak
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
859
views
8.4 years ago
tianf
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
2.1k
views
8.9 years ago
Mandy
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
1.2k
views
9.2 years ago
koenhendriks89
•
0
0
votes
0
replies
1.2k
views
12.0 years ago
Jeremy Ng
▴
180
0
votes
1
reply
1.5k
views
updated 12.8 years ago by
Joern Toedling
▴
50
•
written 12.8 years ago by
Iain Gallagher
▴
930
0
votes
0
replies
1.3k
views
0
votes
0
replies
1.1k
views
0
votes
2
replies
1.8k
views
updated 13.4 years ago by
Oosting, J. PATH
▴
550
•
written 13.4 years ago by
Pete Shepard
▴
240
0
votes
1
reply
1.2k
views
updated 14.0 years ago by
Mike Smith
★
6.6k
•
written 14.0 years ago by
Mark Dunning
★
1.1k
0
votes
0
replies
908
views
14.5 years ago
Zoppoli, Gabriele NIH/NCI [G]
▴
20
0
votes
3
replies
1.3k
views
updated 14.9 years ago by
Kasper Daniel Hansen
★
6.5k
•
written 14.9 years ago by
Ramzi TEMANNI
▴
160
0
votes
0
replies
1.0k
views
14.9 years ago
Heidi Dvinge
★
2.0k
0
votes
0
replies
5.4k
views
0
votes
1
reply
2.1k
views
updated 15.3 years ago by
Michael Lawrence
▴
620
•
written 15.3 years ago by
Michael Dondrup
▴
140
0
votes
0
replies
808
views
0
votes
1
reply
1.7k
views
updated 15.4 years ago by
steffen@stat.Berkeley.EDU
▴
600
•
written 15.5 years ago by
Mark Robinson
★
1.1k
0
votes
0
replies
1.0k
views
0
votes
0
replies
973
views
15.6 years ago
Tim Rayner
▴
270
0
votes
1
reply
1.4k
views
updated 15.6 years ago by
Wolfgang Huber
★
13k
•
written 15.6 years ago by
Paul Leo
▴
970
0
votes
0
replies
1.1k
views
15.8 years ago
Tim Rayner
▴
270
0
votes
0
replies
833
views
15.8 years ago
Philippe Thomas
▴
30
0
votes
0
replies
1.0k
views
15.8 years ago
steffen@stat.Berkeley.EDU
▴
600
0
votes
0
replies
1.1k
views
15.9 years ago
steffen@stat.Berkeley.EDU
▴
600
0
votes
2
replies
1.2k
views
updated 15.9 years ago by
Wolfgang Huber
★
13k
•
written 15.9 years ago by
Droit Arnaud
▴
130
0
votes
2
replies
1.7k
views
updated 16.0 years ago by
steffen@stat.Berkeley.EDU
▴
600
•
written 16.0 years ago by
Daren Tan
▴
190
0
votes
5
replies
1.9k
views
updated 16.1 years ago by
Camper Chih-Wei Liu
▴
40
•
written 16.1 years ago by
Michael Lawrence
▴
620
0
votes
3
replies
2.2k
views
updated 16.1 years ago by
Steve Lianoglou
★
13k
•
written 16.1 years ago by
Camper Chih-Wei Liu
▴
40
0
votes
0
replies
739
views
16.3 years ago
Amanda Miotto
▴
120
0
votes
1
reply
974
views
updated 16.3 years ago by
James Bullard
▴
70
•
written 16.3 years ago by
Amanda Miotto
▴
120
0
votes
2
replies
1.2k
views
updated 16.3 years ago by
Mark Robinson
★
1.1k
•
written 16.3 years ago by
Amanda Miotto
▴
120
0
votes
2
replies
1000
views
updated 16.3 years ago by
Steve Lianoglou
★
13k
•
written 16.3 years ago by
steffen@stat.Berkeley.EDU
▴
600
0
votes
1
reply
867
views
updated 16.3 years ago by
Mark Robinson
★
1.1k
•
written 16.3 years ago by
Amanda Miotto
▴
120
0
votes
1
reply
2.0k
views
updated 16.4 years ago by
Oosting, J. PATH
▴
550
•
written 16.4 years ago by
Michael Gormley
▴
60
0
votes
1
reply
1.0k
views
updated 16.5 years ago by
James Bullard
▴
70
•
written 16.5 years ago by
Mark Dunning
▴
320
0
votes
0
replies
1.2k
views
Recent ...
Replies
Answer: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
maripane
•
0
Thanks Michael, so is there a way to work around this issue?
Can I somehow make sure I can remove this batch effects without overcorrecti…
Comment: CleanUpRNAseq with a GTF that is missing mitochondria annotation data
by
rcreed
•
0
The updated version worked well on my data. Thank you!
Answer: DE analysis on Single cell RNA Seq time course data (using pseudotime) with 5 di
by
James W. MacDonald
67k
The two contrasts at the bottom are identical but for the sign of the logFC, so you should expect the same results (except for flipped sign…
Comment: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
Michael Love
42k
Oh, i didn't realize there is another method in the mix here.
I would not necessarily trust this "batch correction" method, and suspect o…
Comment: Identifying potentially associated gene set to drug response using GSVA
by
Kent
•
0
Hi @robertc thanks for the reply. I should have explained to you the context first. I am testing over a hundred drugs on patient samples (s…
Votes
Awards
• All
Locations
• All
Türkiye, 2 minutes ago
Austria, 16 minutes ago
The Netherlands, 18 minutes ago
Macao, 22 minutes ago
United States, 25 minutes ago
Türkiye, 2 minutes ago
Austria, 16 minutes ago
The Netherlands, 18 minutes ago
Macao, 22 minutes ago
United States, 25 minutes ago
Traffic: 827 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6