updated 2.3 years ago by
1526466763
•
0
•
written 2.7 years ago by
e.iich
•
0
2
votes
8
replies
5.7k
views
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: Issues with BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm39 and generating motif matrix in Signac (
by
Paul
•
0
You are an absolute lifesaver, thank you so much for the clarification!
Answer: Issues with BSgenome.Mmusculus.UCSC.mm39 and generating motif matrix in Signac (
by
James W. MacDonald
67k
The `EnsDb.Mmusculus.v79` package is mm38, not mm39. If you want a current `EnsDb`, use `AnnotationHub`
```
> library(AnnotationHub)
>…
Comment: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
Michael Love
42k
I'm adding my comment to the threaded section ...
I don't have any suggestions here but whatever method you're using is not appropriate up…
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
880
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Awards
• All
Popular Question to
Anna
▴
20
Popular Question to
Talip
▴
10
Popular Question to
alexandre.blais
▴
50
Locations
• All
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 1 minute ago
United States, 4 minutes ago
United States, 7 minutes ago
France, 8 minutes ago
United States, 8 minutes ago
UPF, Barcelona, Spain, 1 minute ago
United States, 4 minutes ago
United States, 7 minutes ago
France, 8 minutes ago
United States, 8 minutes ago
Traffic: 954 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6