Hi everyone,
I have two assays : fraction and cell (for cell fraction and whole cell experiments, which have been made separately)
and two conditions tested in those two assays: treatment and control.
I don't know if it's relevant here, but I have 3 replicates per conditions, so a total of 12.
I followed this post , because I want to see the DE in the fraction when it's treated compared to the cell, but also compared to control (fraction and cell). We decided to take this design then:
(fraction_treated / cell_treated) / (fraction_control / cell_control)
So my colData
have 2 columns : assay and condition
I then used this code (found in the post cited above):
dds <- DESeqDataSetFromMatrix(countData = countData,
colData = colData,
design = ~ assay + condition + assay:condition)
dds <- DESeq(dds, test="LRT", reduced= ~ assay + condition)
results(dds)
I am not sure if I am doing something wrong, because when I use resultsNames(dds)
, I obtain this:
#[1] "Intercept" "assay_Fraction_vs_Cell" "condition_treatment_vs_control" "assayFraction.conditionTreatment"
If it's the way it should be, does the results will correspond to my design? Or maybe should I use a different contrast?
Thank you very much for your answer! By the way, I made a mistake in my last output, it was
"assayFraction.conditionTreatment"
and not"assayFraction.conditionControl"
. I corrected it.So here is what I did:
Gives me this:
And finally:
I made a volcano plot and a MA plot out if this, but I have to say, I am a little bit disappointed, because there are not that much DE genes. Do you see a mistake here or do you think everything is ok? Thanks again!
Maybe your treatments and conditions don't have much an effect. Does your PCA show clear separation?
There is a clear separation between conditions in the fractions, but not that much for Cell. I think it's normal, because the treatment is not suppose to have a big effect on the cell.