RNASeq data analysis with bio replicates
2
0
Entering edit mode
fakhter1 • 0
@fakhter1-12997
Last seen 7.5 years ago

Hello,

It is my first time doing RNA-Seq data analysis and I don't have any experience in this field. I would highly appreciate if I could get answers for the following questions that I did not understand during my data analysis. I have used 4 bio-replicates for treatment and control each. After following the pipeline to process data, I got FPKM value from cufflink. My questions are:

1. When I looked at the raw FPKM value across the sample bio-replicates for ~1700 genes, I noticed that very few genes have FPKM value for all 4 bio-replicates (not having 0 value) and rest of the genes have FPKM values with 0 for 2/3 replicates. I am not sure how I can account for that FPKM value variance among sample replicates and which steps I should follow for the quality assessment of the data?

2. I used the FPKM value to calculate the differential expression usinf DESeq package in R. But I got P value for all most all the up-regulated (>1.5 fold) and down-regulated (>-1.5 fold) genes in a range of 0.5-0.9. The P value is not <0.05. The adjusted P value is 1 for all of them. Does it mean that those deferentially expressed genes are not statistically significant? How and what is the way to calculate statistical significance of deferentially expressed genes in DESeq?

3. Is that variance among bio-replicates caused this P value in my analysis?  

4. Is another differential expression analysis such as Limma or EdgeR better to account for the variability among bio- replicates?

rnaseq_analysis • 1.6k views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
@james-w-macdonald-5106
Last seen 38 minutes ago
United States
  1. Uh, I wouldn't use cufflinks nor FPKM. Lior Pachter doesn't do that anymore and cufflinks comes from his lab, so you might consider using something more modern like salmon or kallisto and importing using tximport. As for the zeros, with only 1700 genes that might be expected? I suppose it depends on the genes and the tissue.
  2. You shouldn't use FPKM with any package that is intended for count data. This includes DESeq, DESeq2, edgeR, and probably several others that escape me now.
  3. Maybe. Or maybe you don't have enough depth for cufflinks to be useful in this context. Pseudo-alignments to the transcriptome are probably the way to go here - see #1.
  4. Differential expression of RNA-seq data using limma and voom().
     
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
fakhter1 • 0
@fakhter1-12997
Last seen 7.5 years ago

Hi,

Thank you for your reply and suggestions. I am wondering that after aligning with reference genome using TopHat, can I use Salmon or Kallisto that you suggested for transcript assembly? Should I use the raw numbers from cufflink that I currently have (before converting to FPKM value) to calculate differential expression using Limma?

I am confused with so many options for differential expression such as DESeq, Limma or edge R. Which one is the most ideal, reliable and commonly used package for RNA Seq data analysis? 

Thanks again.

 

 

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

If you have a comment, please use the ADD COMMENT button and type in the box that appears. The Add your answer box below is intended for answers, not additional questions.

You should google either salmon or kallisto and read what the authors of those packages say. Neither of those packages does any 'transcript assembly'. They align directly to the transcriptome, so what you are thinking about doing doesn't make any sense.

As for 'the most ideal, reliable and commonly used package', I wouldn't presume to have the answer to that question, any more than I could tell you which car is the best one. While they are all intended to do the same thing, they do it differently, and it's your job (if you are planning to do the analysis) to know what the differences are, and why you are choosing one over the other. There is no substitute for knowing what you are doing, so you should either take the time to learn or find someone who already knows to help you.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 785 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6