Existence of Bioconductor versus Seurat Software Ecosystems Quantitative Comparison
1
0
Entering edit mode
Dario Strbenac ★ 1.5k
@dario-strbenac-5916
Last seen 1 hour ago
Australia

Looking at journal articles, there are two broad approaches to single-cell data preprocessing; Bioconductor-centric and Seurat-centric. The first typically uses log-normalised counts and the second typically uses SCTransform followed by centring and scaling, each followed by their own conventional clustering variety. Is there any direct comparison of these two alternatives, perhaps on simulated data with a known truth?

scran bluster scater scuttle • 520 views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
ATpoint ★ 4.5k
@atpoint-13662
Last seen 1 day ago
Germany

It's Bioconductor, Seurat or ScanPy to be precise that are most commonly used.

There is benchmark literature on all sorts of preprocessing steps, for example transformations: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37037999/

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 485 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6