Technical replicates are really off - how to fix?
0
0
Entering edit mode
Ken Termiso ▴ 250
@ken-termiso-1087
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hi all, >From a recent experiment with affy 133v2 chips, I had four different cases, each with three controls and three experimental chips. The four cases are analyzed separately, since they all rec'd different treatments. Combining them doesn't work since they are all so different. Due to the world being an imperfect place, I only have technical replicates, so all of my statistics are based on these technical replicates. (In the past, from similar experiments, I've been able to confirm ~90% of differential expression with RT-PCR based on this strategy). The problem is, that for one of the cases, two of the experimental chips are much, much brighter than the other one. The six chips were normalized together using RMA, which for this tissue has been the superior normalization all along vs the others we've tried (GCRMA, MAS5.0, and li-wong). Here is a random selection of probesets to illustrate what I'm saying - Control 1 Control 2 Control 3 Exp 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 3514.66 2917.78 1960.94 3915.28 13710.44 13385.72 2272.28 2004.44 1387.7 2751.73 8759.5 8596.44 568.71 396.12 335.61 614.27 1617.23 2374.7 1754.51 1250.99 1082.94 1781.94 7261.92 7679.01 2156.23 1709.61 1394.24 2793.15 8053.99 11112.1 468.04 452.48 382.7 605.1 1692.47 3202.71 Our (somewhat lousy) core processed these chips about a year ago, so I'm wondering if there's anything I can do to deal with the last two experimental chips, which are way, way off...I'd like to bring them down to the realm of the other exp chip without introducing any bias before doing stats to find significant, diff expressed genes. Thanks in advance, Ken
affy affy • 776 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 537 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6