Dear Davide, thanks for the quick answer, I will try and elaborate the experimental design.
we have
species (polyploidy) |
number of individual / nbr of technical replicates |
D. fuchsii (diploid) |
4, 1 ind with tech rep |
D. incarnata (diploid) |
5, 0 ind with tech rep |
D. majalis (polyploid) |
8, 4 ind with tech rep |
D. traunsteineri (polyploid) |
11, 6 ind with tech rep |
total |
28, 11 ind with tech rep |
I am doing two-by-two comparaison between these species. I observe a clear batch effect between the polyploid species
Image: http://imgur.com/OPowmEU
I believe (at least for the polyploid comparaisons) that the unwanted batch effect (W unwanted factor) and the biological variance of interest (difference between species) are not colinear. I have samples of both species in both batches.
When I compare the polyploid to the diploid on the other hand, none of the diploid samples are in either of the batches for which I observe a batch effect in the polyploids. I still correct, using RUVs, the batch effect in the polyploid. After finding DE genes, I get a strange MA plot
Image: http://imgur.com/DnFb5Pd
I hope the "design" is a bit clearer.
I am interested in differences between species (which happen to have different polyploidy levels). Could RUV be affected by these levels of polyploidy (e.g. if I look at DE genes overlaps between the comparaison diplo.vs.poly and poly.vs.poly, are these groups comparable after normalisation?)? Should I look into removing different numbers of factors of unwanted variance (k) when doing diplo.vs.poly, poly.vs.poly or diplo.vs.diplo comparaisons? I am not sure...
Thanks again for your help, cheers
Dear, Davide. Thank you for your answer, I answered on the post below too