Here is the latest static table of peer review allocations for bioconductor packages. Package Maintainer Version Peer reviewer ------- ---------- ------- ------------- Biobase RG, VC 0.5-2 RI [vol 6apr] annotate RG 0.5 JZ [vol 8apr] affy RI 0.8.0 BE [vol 8apr] AnnBuilder JZ 0.5 RI [vol 6apr] bin2d RG 0.5 edd VC 0.5-2 DB [vol 8apr] genecluster RG 0.1 genefilter RG 0.5-2 SD [vol 6apr] geneplotter JG 0.1 DB [vol 8apr] rhdf5 RG 0.1-0 multtest YG 0.6 NBIR VC 0.1-1 RanForests VC 0.2 ROC VC 0.5-4 tkWidgets JZ 0.5 JG [vol 8apr] marrayClasses SD 0.1 marrayNorm SD 0.1 marrayPlots SD 0.1 marrayInput JY 0.1 JZ [vol 9apr] I have created an R structure with this package/version list and a function df2html that is used to create the information in PRevSandBox, accessible at the wiki under the peer review node. To get to the new structure, go to the bioconductor wiki, and follow the link to peer review from the first page. there is a new introductory paragraph on the PeerReview page with a link to PRevSandBox. Go there. You will see an HTML version of the table above. The rightmost column is a column of anchors. Clicking on an anchor takes you down a level into a package-specific evaluation area. [Some packages have question-mark next to the PRNode suffix ... you can click on the question mark to establish the new area yourself] At the moment we do not have a specified structure for peer review data but that will be forthcoming. If you don't want to use the wiki, just email me your text and i will get it in there. I have little experience programming the wiki content. Anyone with thoughts about how to get a nice template in there to help reviewers cover the key points for the review should e-mail me, or implement it in the sandbox. At my current level of knowledge I would have to go to each package's node and enter a template more or less manually. of course that burden can be passed to the reviewer, and may be.