Why nbinomGLMTest in DESeq reports zero p values
1
0
Entering edit mode
Guest User ★ 13k
@guest-user-4897
Last seen 10.3 years ago
I used nbinomGLMTest to compare the reduced model and full model given as below, and I got some zero for p values. Is this possible for nbinomGLMTest? If so, what's the potential reason? Thanks Full model: full<-fitNbinomGLMs(cdsFull,count~Line+Rep+Sex) Reduced model: reduced<-fitNbinomGLMs(cdsFull,count~Line+Rep) -- output of sessionInfo(): sessionInfo() R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16) Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252 [4] LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 attached base packages: [1] parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] DESeq_1.12.1 lattice_0.20-15 locfit_1.5-9.1 Biobase_2.20.1 BiocGenerics_0.6.0 edgeR_3.2.4 limma_3.16.8 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] annotate_1.38.0 AnnotationDbi_1.22.6 DBI_0.2-7 genefilter_1.42.0 geneplotter_1.38.0 grid_3.0.1 [7] IRanges_1.18.4 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 RSQLite_0.11.4 splines_3.0.1 stats4_3.0.1 survival_2.37-4 [13] XML_3.98-1.1 xtable_1.7-1 -- Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org.
• 1.1k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@wolfgang-huber-3550
Last seen 3 months ago
EMBL European Molecular Biology Laborat…
Dear Yanzhu one potential explanation is that the model with sex fits your data a lot better than without sex, for some genes, and that a small p-value results. Note that R (and hence DESeq) uses floating-point arithmetic, so a range of small numbers (on the real axis) are all represented by the same value (in R) of 0. It is not unusual that expression for some genes shows a strong sex effect. For instance, if you are looking at data from a mammal, it is plausible that the X and Y chromosomes contain such genes. Kind regards Wolfgang Il giorno 07 Feb 2014, alle ore 17:51, Yanzhu [guest] <guest at="" bioconductor.org=""> ha scritto: > > I used nbinomGLMTest to compare the reduced model and full model given as below, and I got some zero for p values. Is this possible for nbinomGLMTest? If so, what's the potential reason? Thanks > > > Full model: > full<-fitNbinomGLMs(cdsFull,count~Line+Rep+Sex) > > Reduced model: > reduced<-fitNbinomGLMs(cdsFull,count~Line+Rep) > > > -- output of sessionInfo(): > > sessionInfo() > R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16) > Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) > > locale: > [1] LC_COLLATE=English_United States.1252 LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252 LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252 > [4] LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=English_United States.1252 > > attached base packages: > [1] parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base > > other attached packages: > [1] DESeq_1.12.1 lattice_0.20-15 locfit_1.5-9.1 Biobase_2.20.1 BiocGenerics_0.6.0 edgeR_3.2.4 limma_3.16.8 > > loaded via a namespace (and not attached): > [1] annotate_1.38.0 AnnotationDbi_1.22.6 DBI_0.2-7 genefilter_1.42.0 geneplotter_1.38.0 grid_3.0.1 > [7] IRanges_1.18.4 RColorBrewer_1.0-5 RSQLite_0.11.4 splines_3.0.1 stats4_3.0.1 survival_2.37-4 > [13] XML_3.98-1.1 xtable_1.7-1 > > > > > > > -- > Sent via the guest posting facility at bioconductor.org. > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 625 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6