New GO terms after TopGO enrichment? (updated)
1
0
Entering edit mode
Adrian Alexa ▴ 400
@adrian-alexa-936
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hi Bernardo, this is normal and it is a consequence of the True Path Rule. After all, you want to perform the enrichment test on the GO ontology not only on a selected number of GO terms. Regards, Adrian On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Bernardo Bello <popnard@gmail.com> wrote: > Possible answer -> These new GO terms seem to be the parents of the already > GO terms present in my original dataset. > > Original question: > > Hi there, > > I ran an enrichment analysis with custom annotations using TopGO and > surprisingly I obtained new GO terms inside the significant GO terms. > > Is that possible? The only reason I can imagine this is possible is > because TopGO adds new GO terms based on the input GO terms, since GO > ontology is structured hierarchically. > > Please let me know if you need more details about the experiment. > > Code: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8-ZAuZe8jldbjNuTHhNeXRVX00/edit?us p=sharing > > TopGO output: > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8-ZAuZe8jldZnlYUzlxZ3psMWc/edit?us p=sharing > > Thanks, Bernardo > > > -- > > *Bernardo Bello Ortí* > > PhD student > > CReSA-IRTA > > Campus de Bellaterra-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona > > Edifici CReSA > > 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona, Spain) > > Tel.: 647 42 52 63 *www.cresa.es * > > * > * > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
GO topGO GO topGO • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
biotech ▴ 160
@biotech-6194
Last seen 7.7 years ago
European Union
Thanks for the clarification Adrian. Could you please recommend some key publications about GO terminology? I would like to understand this more in depth. Bernardo 2013/11/1 Adrian Alexa <adrian.alexa@gmail.com> > Hi Bernardo, > > this is normal and it is a consequence of the True Path Rule. After all, > you want to perform the enrichment test on the GO ontology not only on a > selected number of GO terms. > > Regards, > Adrian > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Bernardo Bello <popnard@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Possible answer -> These new GO terms seem to be the parents of the >> already >> GO terms present in my original dataset. >> >> Original question: >> >> Hi there, >> >> I ran an enrichment analysis with custom annotations using TopGO and >> surprisingly I obtained new GO terms inside the significant GO terms. >> >> Is that possible? The only reason I can imagine this is possible is >> because TopGO adds new GO terms based on the input GO terms, since GO >> ontology is structured hierarchically. >> >> Please let me know if you need more details about the experiment. >> >> Code: >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8-ZAuZe8jldbjNuTHhNeXRVX00/edit?u sp=sharing >> >> TopGO output: >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8-ZAuZe8jldZnlYUzlxZ3psMWc/edit?u sp=sharing >> >> Thanks, Bernardo >> >> >> -- >> >> *Bernardo Bello Ortí* >> >> >> PhD student >> >> CReSA-IRTA >> >> Campus de Bellaterra-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona >> >> Edifici CReSA >> >> 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona, Spain) >> >> Tel.: 647 42 52 63 *www.cresa.es * >> >> * >> * >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor@r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >> > > -- *Bernardo Bello Ortí* PhD student CReSA-IRTA Campus de Bellaterra-Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Edifici CReSA 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona, Spain) Tel.: 647 42 52 63 *www.cresa.es * * * [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 765 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6