Double KO and timecourse design / limma
1
0
Entering edit mode
@textoris-julien-1412
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Dear all, First thing, happy new year to all and thanks for all the knowledge/advices brought through the list ! I would like to have your advice/comments on the following design. I have to analyse a microarray dataset performed on MoGene ST 1.0 which comprise 22 arrays. I have allmost no replicates (! could not control this !) but I thought I could use the timecourse and double KO/single KO status to overcome this ? The variables are : - Treatment : binary YES or NO - Time : samples at 0h (= UNTREATED), 2h, 6h and 18h - Strain : Wild type (WT), single KO for gene A or gene B, and double KO. For WT mice, I have 2 UNTREATED (=0h), and a timecourse for Treatment 1 and 0 (WT_UNT_2h, and WT_TTT_2h). For KO mice, I only have treated samples (except time 0h, which is considered untreated). I have duplicates only for WT.UNTREATED_0h and KOA_0h. I wrote the following design : levels(f) = c("WT_0h","WT_2h","WT_6h","WT_18h","WT_UNT_2h","WT_UNT_6h","WT_UNT_18h ","KOA_0h","KOA_2h", ...,"DKO_0h","DKO_2h","DKO_6h","DKO_18h") and performed the contrast matrix over time like his : cont.wt = contrast.matrix( "WT_18h-WT_6h", "WT_6h-WT_2h", "WT_2h-WT_0h", levels=design) idem for KOA, KOB and DKO, and then the comparisons : cont.koa.wt = contrast.matrix( "(KOA_18h-KOA_6h)-(WT_18h-WT_6h)", etc... How would you handle the strain variable ? As one variable with four levels : WT, KOA, KOB, DKO ? Or is it possible to take into account that DKO is somehow like KOA+KOB ? Do I have to transform 'Strain' into three binary variables : WT (1/0), KOA(1/0) and KOB (1/0) and code DKO as KOA = 1 and KOB = 1 ? The second question is I don't know how to integrate the WT mice that are untreated ? This experimental design is a bit too complex for me, so any advice would be greatly appreciated ! Thanks in advance, Julien
Microarray TimeCourse timecourse Microarray TimeCourse timecourse • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
@gordon-smyth
Last seen 3 hours ago
WEHI, Melbourne, Australia
> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:29:17 +0100 > From: Textoris Julien <julien.textoris at="" gmail.com=""> > To: bioconductor at r-project.org > Subject: [BioC] Double KO and timecourse design / limma > > Dear all, > > First thing, happy new year to all and thanks for all the > knowledge/advices brought through the list ! > > I would like to have your advice/comments on the following design. > > I have to analyse a microarray dataset performed on MoGene ST 1.0 which > comprise 22 arrays. I have allmost no replicates (! could not control > this !) but I thought I could use the timecourse and double KO/single KO > status to overcome this ? Not sure what you mean. You need replicates. If you don't have them, then show us all 22 rows of the targets frame so we can see what else might be done. > The variables are : > - Treatment : binary YES or NO > - Time : samples at 0h (= UNTREATED), 2h, 6h and 18h > - Strain : Wild type (WT), single KO for gene A or gene B, and double KO. > > For WT mice, I have 2 UNTREATED (=0h), and a timecourse for Treatment 1 > and 0 (WT_UNT_2h, and WT_TTT_2h). For KO mice, I only have treated > samples (except time 0h, which is considered untreated). > > I have duplicates only for WT.UNTREATED_0h and KOA_0h. > > I wrote the following design : > > levels(f) = > c("WT_0h","WT_2h","WT_6h","WT_18h","WT_UNT_2h","WT_UNT_6h","WT_UNT_1 8h","KOA_0h","KOA_2h", > ...,"DKO_0h","DKO_2h","DKO_6h","DKO_18h") > > and performed the contrast matrix over time like his : > > cont.wt = contrast.matrix( > "WT_18h-WT_6h", > "WT_6h-WT_2h", > "WT_2h-WT_0h", > levels=design) > > idem for KOA, KOB and DKO, and then the comparisons : > > cont.koa.wt = contrast.matrix( > "(KOA_18h-KOA_6h)-(WT_18h-WT_6h)", > etc... > > > How would you handle the strain variable ? As one variable with four > levels : WT, KOA, KOB, DKO ? Or is it possible to take into account that > DKO is somehow like KOA+KOB ? Do I have to transform 'Strain' into three > binary variables : WT (1/0), KOA(1/0) and KOB (1/0) and code DKO as KOA > = 1 and KOB = 1 ? You have already incorporated the strain variable. There is no need to do anything else or to make any transformations. You can test whether DKO is like KOA+KOB by testing the appropriate contrast. > The second question is I don't know how to integrate the WT mice that > are untreated ? By forming contrasts of interest. Best wishes Gordon > This experimental design is a bit too complex for me, so any advice > would be greatly appreciated ! > > Thanks in advance, > > Julien ______________________________________________________________________ The information in this email is confidential and intend...{{dropped:4}}
ADD COMMENT •
0
Entering edit mode
Le 08/01/2013 01:43, Gordon K Smyth a ?crit : > >> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:29:17 +0100 >> From: Textoris Julien <julien.textoris at="" gmail.com=""> >> To: bioconductor at r-project.org >> Subject: [BioC] Double KO and timecourse design / limma >> >> Dear all, >> >> First thing, happy new year to all and thanks for all the >> knowledge/advices brought through the list ! >> >> I would like to have your advice/comments on the following design. >> >> I have to analyse a microarray dataset performed on MoGene ST 1.0 which >> comprise 22 arrays. I have allmost no replicates (! could not control >> this !) but I thought I could use the timecourse and double KO/single KO >> status to overcome this ? >> > > Not sure what you mean. You need replicates. If you don't have them, > then show us all 22 rows of the targets frame so we can see what else > might be done. > Hi, here is the targets description: id FileName ShortName Treatment Time KO A-KO B-KO A AKO T 18H.CEL KOA_18h 1 18 1 1 0 B AKO T 2H bis.CEL KOA_2h 1 2 1 1 0 C AKO T 2H.CEL KOA_2h 1 2 1 1 0 D AKO T 6H.CEL KOA_6h 1 6 1 1 0 E AKO UNT bis.CEL KOA_0h 0 0 1 1 0 F AKO UNT.CEL KOA_0h 0 0 1 1 0 G DKO 18H.CEL DKO_18h 1 18 1 1 1 H DKO 2H.CEL DKO_2h 1 2 1 1 1 I DKO 6H.CEL DKO_6h 1 6 1 1 1 J DKO UNT.CEL DKO_0h 0 0 1 1 1 K BKObis 18H.CEL KOB_18h 1 18 1 0 1 L BKObis 2H.CEL KOB_2h 1 2 1 0 1 M BKObis 6H.CEL KOB_6h 1 6 1 0 1 N BKObis UNT.CEL KOB_0h 0 0 1 0 1 O WT 18H.CEL WT_UNT_18h 1 18 0 0 0 P WT 2H.CEL WT_UNT_2h 1 2 0 0 0 Q WT 6H.CEL WT_UNT_6h 1 6 0 0 0 R WT T 18H.CEL WT_18h 1 18 0 0 0 S WT T 2H.CEL WT_2h 1 2 0 0 0 T WT T 6H.CEL WT_6h 1 6 0 0 0 U WT UNT.CEL WT_0h 0 0 0 0 0 V WT UNT.CEL WT_0h 0 0 0 0 0 >> The variables are : >> - Treatment : binary YES or NO >> - Time : samples at 0h (= UNTREATED), 2h, 6h and 18h >> - Strain : Wild type (WT), single KO for gene A or gene B, and >> double KO. >> >> For WT mice, I have 2 UNTREATED (=0h), and a timecourse for Treatment 1 >> and 0 (WT_UNT_2h, and WT_TTT_2h). For KO mice, I only have treated >> samples (except time 0h, which is considered untreated). >> >> I have duplicates only for WT.UNTREATED_0h and KOA_0h. >> >> I wrote the following design : >> >> levels(f) = >> c("WT_0h","WT_2h","WT_6h","WT_18h","WT_UNT_2h","WT_UNT_6h","WT_UNT_ 18h","KOA_0h","KOA_2h", >> >> ...,"DKO_0h","DKO_2h","DKO_6h","DKO_18h") >> >> and performed the contrast matrix over time like his : >> >> cont.wt = contrast.matrix( >> "WT_18h-WT_6h", >> "WT_6h-WT_2h", >> "WT_2h-WT_0h", >> levels=design) >> >> idem for KOA, KOB and DKO, and then the comparisons : >> >> cont.koa.wt = contrast.matrix( >> "(KOA_18h-KOA_6h)-(WT_18h-WT_6h)", >> etc... >> >> >> How would you handle the strain variable ? As one variable with four >> levels : WT, KOA, KOB, DKO ? Or is it possible to take into account that >> DKO is somehow like KOA+KOB ? Do I have to transform 'Strain' into three >> binary variables : WT (1/0), KOA(1/0) and KOB (1/0) and code DKO as KOA >> = 1 and KOB = 1 ? >> > > You have already incorporated the strain variable. There is no need to > do anything else or to make any transformations. > > You can test whether DKO is like KOA+KOB by testing the appropriate > contrast. > >> The second question is I don't know how to integrate the WT mice that >> are untreated ? >> > > By forming contrasts of interest. > > Best wishes > Gordon > I understand that I am lacking the basics. I sorry to ask this, but what is the "appropriate" contrast ? I'm sure the answer is "the one that answers your (biological) question", but if I always understand the simple examples (eg, a single KO vs WT design), I have not been able to find a simple tutorial explaining how to write the complex ones. For example, to compare DKO and KOA+KOB, I tested (without understanding what i'm doing) the following solutions: cont.dif.dko2.ovt = makeContrasts( "(DKO_2h-DKO_0h)-((KOB_2h+KOA_2h)-(KOB_0h+KOA_0h))", "(DKO_6h-DKO_2h)-((KOB_6h+KOA_6h)-(KOB_2h+KOA_2h))", "(DKO_18h-DKO_6h)-((KOB_18h+KOA_18h)-(KOB_6h+KOA_6h))", levels=design) fit2 <- contrasts.fit(fit, cont.dif.dko2.ovt) fit2 <- eBayes(fit2) #topTableF(fit2, adjust="BH") res = decideTests(fit2,p.value=0.05,lfc=log2(1.5)) ind = which( apply(res,1,function(x) {length(which(x != 0))>0}) == T) length(ind) #10 cont.dif.dko3.ovt = makeContrasts( "(DKO_2h-DKO_0h)-((KOB_2h*KOA_2h)-(KOB_0h*KOA_0h))", "(DKO_6h-DKO_2h)-((KOB_6h*KOA_6h)-(KOB_2h*KOA_2h))", "(DKO_18h-DKO_6h)-((KOB_18h*KOA_18h)-(KOB_6h*KOA_6h))", levels=design) fit2 <- contrasts.fit(fit, cont.dif.dko3.ovt) fit2 <- eBayes(fit2) #topTableF(fit2, adjust="BH") res = decideTests(fit2,p.value=0.05,lfc=log2(1.5)) ind = which( apply(res,1,function(x) {length(which(x != 0))>0}) == T) length(ind) #276 cont.dif.dko4.ovt = makeContrasts( "(DKO_2h-DKO_0h)-(KOB_2h-KOB_0h)", "(DKO_2h-DKO_0h)-(KOA_2h-KOA_0h)", "(DKO_6h-DKO_2h)-(KOB_6h-KOB_2h)", "(DKO_6h-DKO_2h)-(KOA_6h-KOA_2h)", "(DKO_18h-DKO_6h)-(KOB_18h-KOB_6h)", "(DKO_18h-DKO_6h)-(KOA_18h-KOA_6h)", levels=design) fit2 <- contrasts.fit(fit, cont.dif.dko4.ovt) fit2 <- eBayes(fit2) #topTableF(fit2, adjust="BH") res = decideTests(fit2,p.value=0.05,lfc=log2(1.5)) ind = which( apply(res,1,function(x) {length(which(x != 0))>0}) == T) length(ind) #0 -> I don't know how to choose between the three ! I would take the first, but don't really know why ... Is there a good tutorial/blog to learn how to go from experimental design to model design/contrast ? Thanks again, Julien >> This experimental design is a bit too complex for me, so any advice >> would be greatly appreciated ! >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Julien >> > > ______________________________________________________________________ > The information in this email is confidential and intended solely for > the addressee. > You must not disclose, forward, print or use it without the permission > of the sender. > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- Envoy? de mon ENIAC Julien Textoris, MD, PhD Laboratoire d'immunologie, UMR CNRS 7278, INSERM U1095 Facult? de M?decine Timone, Marseille +33 (0)4 91 32 49 71 Service d'anesth?sie et de r?animation H?pital Nord, Marseille +33 (0)4 91 96 55 31
ADD REPLY •
0
Entering edit mode
Dear Julien, Rows U and V of your targets frame seem to be the same CEL file. Perhaps that is a mis-print. The only real tutorial on how to go from experimental design to model design/contrast is the limma User's Guide. My philosophy is that is the up to the biologist to decide what the questions of the interest are, and this includes deciding which samples it makes sense to compare. The makeContrasts() syntax in limma gives you a way to compare any combination of conditions you like, and you seem to be well able to use that. I can't comment on your proposed contrasts, because I don't know what you are trying to do. They don't correspond to anything obvious to me. I would have thought that if you want to test DKO=KOA+KOB, at time 0h for example, then you would simply test the contrast DKO_0h - (KOA_0h+KOB_0h) because this contrast equal to zero is mathematically the same as DKO_0h = (KOA_0h+KOB_0h). Best wishes Gordon --------------------------------------------- Professor Gordon K Smyth, Bioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia. http://www.statsci.org/smyth On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Textoris Julien wrote: > Le 08/01/2013 01:43, Gordon K Smyth a ?crit : > >> >>> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:29:17 +0100 >>> From: Textoris Julien <julien.textoris at="" gmail.com=""> >>> To: bioconductor at r-project.org >>> Subject: [BioC] Double KO and timecourse design / limma >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> First thing, happy new year to all and thanks for all the >>> knowledge/advices brought through the list ! >>> >>> I would like to have your advice/comments on the following design. >>> >>> I have to analyse a microarray dataset performed on MoGene ST 1.0 which >>> comprise 22 arrays. I have allmost no replicates (! could not control >>> this !) but I thought I could use the timecourse and double KO/single KO >>> status to overcome this ? >>> >> >> Not sure what you mean. You need replicates. If you don't have them, then >> show us all 22 rows of the targets frame so we can see what else might be >> done. >> > > Hi, > > here is the targets description: > > id FileName ShortName Treatment Time KO A-KO B-KO > > A AKO T 18H.CEL KOA_18h 1 18 1 1 0 > B AKO T 2H bis.CEL KOA_2h 1 2 1 1 0 > C AKO T 2H.CEL KOA_2h 1 2 1 1 0 > D AKO T 6H.CEL KOA_6h 1 6 1 1 0 > E AKO UNT bis.CEL KOA_0h 0 0 1 1 0 > F AKO UNT.CEL KOA_0h 0 0 1 1 0 > G DKO 18H.CEL DKO_18h 1 18 1 1 1 > H DKO 2H.CEL DKO_2h 1 2 1 1 1 > I DKO 6H.CEL DKO_6h 1 6 1 1 1 > J DKO UNT.CEL DKO_0h 0 0 1 1 1 > K BKObis 18H.CEL KOB_18h 1 18 1 0 1 > L BKObis 2H.CEL KOB_2h 1 2 1 0 1 > M BKObis 6H.CEL KOB_6h 1 6 1 0 1 > N BKObis UNT.CEL KOB_0h 0 0 1 0 1 > O WT 18H.CEL WT_UNT_18h 1 18 0 0 0 > P WT 2H.CEL WT_UNT_2h 1 2 0 0 0 > Q WT 6H.CEL WT_UNT_6h 1 6 0 0 0 > R WT T 18H.CEL WT_18h 1 18 0 0 0 > S WT T 2H.CEL WT_2h 1 2 0 0 0 > T WT T 6H.CEL WT_6h 1 6 0 0 0 > U WT UNT.CEL WT_0h 0 0 0 0 0 > V WT UNT.CEL WT_0h 0 0 0 0 0 > > >>> The variables are : >>> - Treatment : binary YES or NO >>> - Time : samples at 0h (= UNTREATED), 2h, 6h and 18h >>> - Strain : Wild type (WT), single KO for gene A or gene B, and double KO. >>> >>> For WT mice, I have 2 UNTREATED (=0h), and a timecourse for Treatment 1 >>> and 0 (WT_UNT_2h, and WT_TTT_2h). For KO mice, I only have treated >>> samples (except time 0h, which is considered untreated). >>> >>> I have duplicates only for WT.UNTREATED_0h and KOA_0h. >>> >>> I wrote the following design : >>> >>> levels(f) = >>> c("WT_0h","WT_2h","WT_6h","WT_18h","WT_UNT_2h","WT_UNT_6h","WT_UNT _18h","KOA_0h","KOA_2h", >>> ...,"DKO_0h","DKO_2h","DKO_6h","DKO_18h") >>> >>> and performed the contrast matrix over time like his : >>> >>> cont.wt = contrast.matrix( >>> "WT_18h-WT_6h", >>> "WT_6h-WT_2h", >>> "WT_2h-WT_0h", >>> levels=design) >>> >>> idem for KOA, KOB and DKO, and then the comparisons : >>> >>> cont.koa.wt = contrast.matrix( >>> "(KOA_18h-KOA_6h)-(WT_18h-WT_6h)", >>> etc... >>> >>> >>> How would you handle the strain variable ? As one variable with four >>> levels : WT, KOA, KOB, DKO ? Or is it possible to take into account that >>> DKO is somehow like KOA+KOB ? Do I have to transform 'Strain' into three >>> binary variables : WT (1/0), KOA(1/0) and KOB (1/0) and code DKO as KOA >>> = 1 and KOB = 1 ? >>> >> >> You have already incorporated the strain variable. There is no need to do >> anything else or to make any transformations. >> >> You can test whether DKO is like KOA+KOB by testing the appropriate >> contrast. >> >>> The second question is I don't know how to integrate the WT mice that >>> are untreated ? >>> >> >> By forming contrasts of interest. >> >> Best wishes >> Gordon >> > I understand that I am lacking the basics. I sorry to ask this, but what is > the "appropriate" contrast ? I'm sure the answer is "the one that answers > your (biological) question", but if I always understand the simple examples > (eg, a single KO vs WT design), I have not been able to find a simple > tutorial explaining how to write the complex ones. > > For example, to compare DKO and KOA+KOB, I tested (without understanding what > i'm doing) the following solutions: > > cont.dif.dko2.ovt = makeContrasts( > "(DKO_2h-DKO_0h)-((KOB_2h+KOA_2h)-(KOB_0h+KOA_0h))", > "(DKO_6h-DKO_2h)-((KOB_6h+KOA_6h)-(KOB_2h+KOA_2h))", > "(DKO_18h-DKO_6h)-((KOB_18h+KOA_18h)-(KOB_6h+KOA_6h))", > levels=design) > fit2 <- contrasts.fit(fit, cont.dif.dko2.ovt) > fit2 <- eBayes(fit2) > #topTableF(fit2, adjust="BH") > res = decideTests(fit2,p.value=0.05,lfc=log2(1.5)) > ind = which( apply(res,1,function(x) {length(which(x != 0))>0}) == T) > length(ind) > #10 > > cont.dif.dko3.ovt = makeContrasts( > "(DKO_2h-DKO_0h)-((KOB_2h*KOA_2h)-(KOB_0h*KOA_0h))", > "(DKO_6h-DKO_2h)-((KOB_6h*KOA_6h)-(KOB_2h*KOA_2h))", > "(DKO_18h-DKO_6h)-((KOB_18h*KOA_18h)-(KOB_6h*KOA_6h))", > levels=design) > fit2 <- contrasts.fit(fit, cont.dif.dko3.ovt) > fit2 <- eBayes(fit2) > #topTableF(fit2, adjust="BH") > res = decideTests(fit2,p.value=0.05,lfc=log2(1.5)) > ind = which( apply(res,1,function(x) {length(which(x != 0))>0}) == T) > length(ind) > #276 > > cont.dif.dko4.ovt = makeContrasts( > "(DKO_2h-DKO_0h)-(KOB_2h-KOB_0h)", > "(DKO_2h-DKO_0h)-(KOA_2h-KOA_0h)", > > "(DKO_6h-DKO_2h)-(KOB_6h-KOB_2h)", > "(DKO_6h-DKO_2h)-(KOA_6h-KOA_2h)", > > "(DKO_18h-DKO_6h)-(KOB_18h-KOB_6h)", > "(DKO_18h-DKO_6h)-(KOA_18h-KOA_6h)", > levels=design) > fit2 <- contrasts.fit(fit, cont.dif.dko4.ovt) > fit2 <- eBayes(fit2) > #topTableF(fit2, adjust="BH") > res = decideTests(fit2,p.value=0.05,lfc=log2(1.5)) > ind = which( apply(res,1,function(x) {length(which(x != 0))>0}) == T) > length(ind) > #0 > > -> I don't know how to choose between the three ! I would take the first, but > don't really know why ... > > Is there a good tutorial/blog to learn how to go from experimental design to > model design/contrast ? > > Thanks again, > > Julien > > >>> This experimental design is a bit too complex for me, so any advice >>> would be greatly appreciated ! >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>> Julien >>> >> >> > > -- Envoy? de mon ENIAC Julien Textoris, MD, PhD Laboratoire d'immunologie, > UMR CNRS 7278, INSERM U1095 Facult? de M?decine Timone, Marseille +33 (0)4 91 > 32 49 71 Service d'anesth?sie et de r?animation H?pital Nord, Marseille +33 > (0)4 91 96 55 31 > > ______________________________________________________________________ The information in this email is confidential and intend...{{dropped:5}}
ADD REPLY •

Login before adding your answer.

Similar Posts
Loading Similar Posts
Traffic: 418 users visited in the last hour
Content Search
Users
Tags
Badges
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6