expression status from pvalues
1
0
Entering edit mode
Alyaa Mahmoud ▴ 440
@alyaa-mahmoud-4670
Last seen 4.7 years ago
Hi All Is there a way to determine expression status of a gene (up, down) from corrected p.values ? Thanks a lot Alyaa -- Alyaa Mahmoud "Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none"- Shakespeare [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
• 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@james-w-macdonald-5106
Last seen 2 hours ago
United States
Hi Alyaa, On 7/11/2012 2:59 AM, Alyaa Mahmoud wrote: > Hi All > > Is there a way to determine expression status of a gene (up, down) from > corrected p.values ? No. The p-values are strictly between 0 and 1, so there is no way to discern the sign of the underlying t-statistic. This would not be true if you were doing a one-sided t-test, but I can't imagine a use case for a one-sided t-test in the context of microarray analysis. Best, Jim > > Thanks a lot > Alyaa > -- James W. MacDonald, M.S. Biostatistician University of Washington Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences 4225 Roosevelt Way NE, # 100 Seattle WA 98105-6099
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
I can easily think of a reason for a one-sided test. Consider the case where I have copy number data and gene expression data on a bunch of samples, and I'd like to test whether changes in gene expression go the same direction as changes in copy number. On 7/11/2012 8:21 AM, James W. MacDonald wrote: > Hi Alyaa, > > On 7/11/2012 2:59 AM, Alyaa Mahmoud wrote: >> Hi All >> >> Is there a way to determine expression status of a gene (up, down) from >> corrected p.values ? > > No. The p-values are strictly between 0 and 1, so there is no way to > discern the sign of the underlying t-statistic. This would not be true > if you were doing a one-sided t-test, but I can't imagine a use case > for a one-sided t-test in the context of microarray analysis. > > Best, > > Jim > > >> >> Thanks a lot >> Alyaa >> >
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available URL: <https: stat.ethz.ch="" pipermail="" bioconductor="" attachments="" 20120712="" 573f1a31="" attachment.ksh="">
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
It depends. In CLL, almost all of the copy number changes are single copy gains or single copy losses (for different genes). So the copy number data only has two levels, in which case correlation doesn't tell you very much and a one-sided t-test is better. Kevin On 7/12/2012 12:18 AM, Alyaa Mahmoud wrote: > wouldn't we try a correlation test better then ? > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Kevin R. Coombes > <kevin.r.coombes@gmail.com <mailto:kevin.r.coombes@gmail.com="">> wrote: > > I can easily think of a reason for a one-sided test. Consider the > case where I have copy number data and gene expression data on a > bunch of samples, and I'd like to test whether changes in gene > expression go the same direction as changes in copy number. > > On 7/11/2012 8:21 AM, James W. MacDonald wrote: > > Hi Alyaa, > > On 7/11/2012 2:59 AM, Alyaa Mahmoud wrote: > > Hi All > > Is there a way to determine expression status of a gene > (up, down) from > corrected p.values ? > > > No. The p-values are strictly between 0 and 1, so there is no > way to discern the sign of the underlying t-statistic. This > would not be true if you were doing a one-sided t-test, but I > can't imagine a use case for a one-sided t-test in the context > of microarray analysis. > > Best, > > Jim > > > > Thanks a lot > Alyaa > > > > > > -- > Alyaa Mahmoud > > "Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none"- Shakespeare > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode
Hi James Thanks a lot, i thought so as well. Its two sided Thanks again yours, Alyaa On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:21 PM, James W. MacDonald <jmacdon@uw.edu> wrote: > Hi Alyaa, > > > On 7/11/2012 2:59 AM, Alyaa Mahmoud wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> Is there a way to determine expression status of a gene (up, down) from >> corrected p.values ? >> > > No. The p-values are strictly between 0 and 1, so there is no way to > discern the sign of the underlying t-statistic. This would not be true if > you were doing a one-sided t-test, but I can't imagine a use case for a > one-sided t-test in the context of microarray analysis. > > Best, > > Jim > > > > >> Thanks a lot >> Alyaa >> >> > -- > James W. MacDonald, M.S. > Biostatistician > University of Washington > Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences > 4225 Roosevelt Way NE, # 100 > Seattle WA 98105-6099 > > -- Alyaa Mahmoud "Love all, trust a few, do wrong to none"- Shakespeare [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 626 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6