besides batch effects, whether adjust for specific quality metric variables (pos_control_mean, neg_control_mean, etc) in the analysis models
1
0
Entering edit mode
shirley zhang ★ 1.0k
@shirley-zhang-2038
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Dear list, I have about 1000 samples run on Affy's exon gene expression arrays. For differential analysis, I was suggested by one of our statistician that in my model, besides batch effects, I have to adjust for the following technical variables. RNA concentration RNA Quality (RIN number) cell counts all_probeset_mean pos_control_mean pos_control_stdev neg_control_mean neg_control_stdev pos_control_mad_residual_mean all_probeset_stdev all_probeset_rle_stdev all_probeset_rle_mean spike-in control variables I have adjusted the first 3 variables in my previous analysis besides treating batch effect as a random effect, but for other variables, I think they are quality metrics to check whether the quality of the Affy array data is high or low during processing the chip (hybridization, scanning, etc.). I've also tried to use principle components and SVA method to deal with hidden variables, but I have not heard about to adjust these specific quality metric variables (pos_control_mean, neg_control_mean, etc) in the analysis models. Could anybody give me more comments and suggestions on this? Thanks a lot, Shirley
sva sva • 1.2k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@kasper-daniel-hansen-2979
Last seen 17 months ago
United States
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:27 AM, shirley zhang <shirley0818 at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > I have about 1000 samples run on Affy's exon gene expression arrays. > For differential analysis, I was suggested by one of our statistician > that in my model, besides batch effects, I have to adjust for the > following technical variables. > > RNA concentration > RNA Quality (RIN number) > cell counts > > all_probeset_mean > pos_control_mean > pos_control_stdev > neg_control_mean > neg_control_stdev > pos_control_mad_residual_mean > all_probeset_stdev > all_probeset_rle_stdev > all_probeset_rle_mean > spike-in control variables > > I have adjusted the first 3 variables in my previous analysis besides > treating batch effect as a random effect, but for other variables, I > think they are quality metrics to check whether the quality of the > Affy array data is high or low during processing the chip > (hybridization, scanning, etc.). > > I've also tried to use principle components and SVA method to deal > with hidden variables, but I have not heard about to adjust these > specific ?quality metric variables (pos_control_mean, > neg_control_mean, etc) in the analysis models. > > Could anybody give me more comments and suggestions on this? I don't think your local statistician really intended for you to control for these variables. But really, why don't you ask him/her again? That is going to be much more profitable than for us to guess at what the intention is. Kasper
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Thanks Kasper and Jeff for your quick response. I did try to use PC and SVA method as Jeff suggested. But my local statistician really suggest me to adjust those Affy specific quality metric variables suck as pos_control_mean, neg_control_mean, etc (totally 19 this kind of variables as I listed in my previous email). He also said since our sample size is pretty big (>1000), it won't be a big problem in terms of degree of freedom. But my concern is I did not see such kind of adjusting in the literature or in this list besides SVA, PC, limma for batch effects, combat, linear mixed model for random batch effects, etc. Thanks again for your reply. Shirley On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen <kasperdanielhansen at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:27 AM, shirley zhang <shirley0818 at="" gmail.com=""> wrote: >> I have about 1000 samples run on Affy's exon gene expression arrays. >> For differential analysis, I was suggested by one of our statistician >> that in my model, besides batch effects, I have to adjust for the >> following technical variables. >> >> RNA concentration >> RNA Quality (RIN number) >> cell counts >> >> all_probeset_mean >> pos_control_mean >> pos_control_stdev >> neg_control_mean >> neg_control_stdev >> pos_control_mad_residual_mean >> all_probeset_stdev >> all_probeset_rle_stdev >> all_probeset_rle_mean >> spike-in control variables >> >> I have adjusted the first 3 variables in my previous analysis besides >> treating batch effect as a random effect, but for other variables, I >> think they are quality metrics to check whether the quality of the >> Affy array data is high or low during processing the chip >> (hybridization, scanning, etc.). >> >> I've also tried to use principle components and SVA method to deal >> with hidden variables, but I have not heard about to adjust these >> specific ?quality metric variables (pos_control_mean, >> neg_control_mean, etc) in the analysis models. >> >> Could anybody give me more comments and suggestions on this? > > I don't think your local statistician really intended for you to > control for these variables. ?But really, why don't you ask him/her > again? ?That is going to be much more profitable than for us to guess > at what the intention is. > > Kasper -- Xiaoling (Shirley) Zhang M.D., Ph.D. (Bioinformatics) Boston University, Boston, MA Tel: (857) 233-9862 Email: zhangxl at bu.edu
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 686 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6