RNA-Seq : comparison cuffdiff, edgeR, Partek
1
0
Entering edit mode
Lana Schaffer ★ 1.3k
@lana-schaffer-1056
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Hi, I have done RNA-Seq using cuffdiff, edgeR, and Partek software And get a different list of differential expressed transcripts For all the software. Has anyone have any comments about this? Lana Schaffer Biostatistics, Informatics DNA Array Core Facility 858-784-2263 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
edgeR edgeR • 1.4k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
vasu punj ▴ 80
@vasu-punj-4410
Last seen 10.2 years ago
It is very difficult to compare all thes results. Perhaps best is you may like to decide first what is the purpose of your study and choose the analysis. If you can confirm in the downstream analysis, that should be it. Partek and Cuffdiff uses a totally different approach. Best. --- On Fri, 10/14/11, Lana Schaffer <schaffer@scripps.edu> wrote: From: Lana Schaffer <schaffer@scripps.edu> Subject: [BioC] RNA-Seq : comparison cuffdiff, edgeR, Partek To: "'bioconductor@r-project.org'" <bioconductor@r-project.org> Date: Friday, October 14, 2011, 1:59 AM Hi, I have done RNA-Seq using cuffdiff, edgeR, and Partek software And get a different list of differential expressed transcripts For all the software. Has anyone have any comments about this? Lana Schaffer Biostatistics, Informatics DNA Array Core Facility 858-784-2263     [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioconductor mailing list Bioconductor@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 864 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6