normalizing 133 a and b
1
0
Entering edit mode
Rob Dunne ▴ 230
@rob-dunne-292
Last seen 10.2 years ago
HI list, how are people normalizing 133a and b chips? here is what I am doing. 1) bg.correct.rma2 (so this is per chip) 2) extract the pm values for all chips 3) for each pair (A and B) get the probes in common (168 genes) and make a linear correction factor to to correct the B chip. 4) adjust all the B chips to thir corresponding A chip 5) put the data (A and B) in a matrix and do quantile normalization 6) this gives me the corrected probes, unfortunately some are now negative so I add a slight fudge factor 7) I read the probes back into an AffyBatch object and get expression values (medianpolish) does this sound reasonable? bye rob -- Rob Dunne Fax: +61 2 9325 3200 Tel: +61 2 9325 3263 CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences +61 2 9325 3100 Locked Bag 17, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia, 1670 http://matilda.vu.edu.au/~dunne Email: Rob.Dunne@csiro.au Java has certainly revolutionized marketing and litigation.
• 805 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Mark Reimers ▴ 20
@mark-reimers-509
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Message: 7 Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 12:18:14 +1100 From: Rob Dunne <rob.dunne@csiro.au> Hi Rob, I think it's unnecessary and even unadvisable to adjust B to the A chips (your step 3 & 4). The affy package does a good job of normalizing both. Do you find consistent discrepancies between results from A and B chips? regards Mark Subject: [BioC] normalizing 133 a and b To: bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch Message-ID: <16297.41302.579995.483402@pride.nsw.cmis.CSIRO.AU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii HI list, how are people normalizing 133a and b chips? here is what I am doing. 1) bg.correct.rma2 (so this is per chip) 2) extract the pm values for all chips 3) for each pair (A and B) get the probes in common (168 genes) and make a linear correction factor to to correct the B chip. 4) adjust all the B chips to thir corresponding A chip 5) put the data (A and B) in a matrix and do quantile normalization 6) this gives me the corrected probes, unfortunately some are now negative so I add a slight fudge factor 7) I read the probes back into an AffyBatch object and get expression values (medianpolish) does this sound reasonable? bye rob -- Rob Dunne Fax: +61 2 9325 3200 Tel: +61 2 9325 3263 CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences +61 2 9325 3100 Locked Bag 17, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia, 1670 http://matilda.vu.edu.au/~dunne Email: Rob.Dunne@csiro.au Java has certainly revolutionized marketing and litigation. -- Mark Reimers, Assistant Professor, Department of Biosciences, and Statistical Expert, Expression Analysis Facility, Karolinska Institute phone: +46-8-608-3333; http://www.bea.ki.se/staff/reimers/
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 645 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6