Yes, but you might need to make it into a data.frame. A list has no concept of dimension. Kasper On Jul 23, 2009, at 13:07 , Wells Oliver wrote: > Ah, yes, that was likely it, but expanding my data set yields a > different > error. Replacing hits w: > hits = list(x=c(121.48999999999999, 34.140000000000001, > 134.53999999999999, > 139.56, 123.48999999999999, 87.349999999999994, 151.61000000000001, > 49.200000000000003, 120.48, 141.56999999999999, 83.329999999999998, > 141.56999999999999, 187.75, 133.53, 46.18, 37.149999999999999, 104.42, > 225.90000000000001, 107.43000000000001, 85.340000000000003, > 142.56999999999999, 173.69, 90.359999999999999, 81.329999999999998, > 84.340000000000003, 41.159999999999997, 74.299999999999997, > 184.74000000000001, 109.44, 131.53, 73.290000000000006, > 89.359999999999999, > 76.310000000000002, 231.93000000000001, 166.66999999999999, 124.5, > 62.25, > 89.359999999999999, 192.77000000000001, 126.51000000000001, > 85.340000000000003, 108.43000000000001, 36.140000000000001, > 231.93000000000001, 220.88, 88.349999999999994, 149.59999999999999, > 52.210000000000001, 98.390000000000001, 198.80000000000001, 165.66, > 153.61000000000001, 190.75999999999999, 191.77000000000001, > 192.77000000000001, 132.53, 88.349999999999994), > y=c(-99.400000000000006, > -66.269999999999996, -94.379999999999995, -21.079999999999998, > -105.42, > -116.47, -59.240000000000002, -69.280000000000001, -22.09, > -80.319999999999993, -127.51000000000001, -13.050000000000001, > -37.149999999999999, -91.370000000000005, -102.41, > -56.219999999999999, > -152.61000000000001, -104.42, -91.370000000000005, -113.45, -120.48, > -22.09, > -51.200000000000003, -61.240000000000002, -65.260000000000005, > -115.45999999999999, -66.269999999999996, -123.48999999999999, > -90.359999999999999, -105.42, -125.5, -101.41, -32.130000000000003, > -92.370000000000005, -115.45999999999999, -102.41, > -53.210000000000001, > -130.52000000000001, -72.290000000000006, -103.41, -120.48, -103.41, > -111.45, -93.370000000000005, -60.240000000000002, -113.45, > -61.240000000000002, -59.240000000000002, -162.65000000000001, > -98.390000000000001, -106.43000000000001, -78.310000000000002, > -110.44, > -113.45, -40.159999999999997, -108.43000000000001, > -78.310000000000002)) > > Now yields: > > Error in M[, 1] : incorrect number of dimensions > > Any ideas? x and y both have the same number of records. > > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Naomi Altman <naomi at="" stat.psu.edu=""> > wrote: > >> I think the problem is that the data are too sparse. Hexbin >> essentially >> creates bins for a histogram, which in the first case only has 2 >> object, >> total. Why don't you have a look in "bin" in both cases to see >> what you >> have. >> >> --Naomi >> >> >> At 03:36 PM 7/23/2009, Wells Oliver wrote: >> >>> Hello all. I'm trying to figure out why plotting one hexbin will >>> work and >>> one will not. >>> The broken one: >>> >>> library(hexbin) >>> hits = list(x=c(121.48999999999999, 34.140000000000001), >>> y=c(99.400000000000006, 66.269999999999996)) >>> bin <- hexbin(hits$x, hits$y) >>> plot(bin) >>> >>> Yields: >>> >>> Error in cut.default(rcnt, colorcut, labels = FALSE) : >>> invalid number of intervals >>> >>> However, >>> >>> hits = list(x=rnorm(1000), y=rnorm(1000)) >>> bin <- hexbin(hits$x, hits$y) >>> plot(bin) >>> >>> Works fine. The thing is printing hits in the former and latter >>> instances >>> both yield a similar data structure. Any ideas? Thank you. >>> >>> -- >>> Wells Oliver >>> wells at submute.net >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Bioconductor mailing list >>> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >>> Search the archives: >>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >>> >> >> Naomi S. Altman 814-865-3791 (voice) >> Associate Professor >> Dept. of Statistics 814-863-7114 (fax) >> Penn State University 814-865-1348 >> (Statistics) >> University Park, PA 16802-2111 >> >> > > > -- > Wells Oliver > wells at submute.net > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor