Entering edit mode
mauede@alice.it
▴
870
@mauedealiceit-3511
Last seen 10.2 years ago
I browsed through your paper.
It looks like CORNA is not another pair (miRNA - target gene)
prediction program like miRANDA and so on ... ?
If I am guessing right (am I ... ?) then what is CORNA basing its
miRNA -target_gene affinity score on ?
In my mind I have the three phases that miRANDA uses to score such
"affinity". Phase-1 implements some empirical Biology rules, phase-2
implements free energy minimization, phase-3 implements conservation
of species. Each phase is a finer screening that assigns a score to
the target match. The final score is the total.
I cannot understand which criteria (empirical or computational) are at
the base of CORNA assessment.
Is it a synthesis of the predictions of the many programs like miRANDA
(for instance many are referred in miRecords).
How is the (miRNA-target_gene) prediction, from computational
programs like miRANDA, accounted for by CORNA ?
How is the biologists' (miRNA-target_gene) validation accounted for
by CORNA ?
I read it uses a number of statistical tests but I cannot figure out
which data the statistics is applied to ... maybe because
I am not familiar with the information stored in the databases
mentioned in the paper.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Maura
tutti i telefonini TIM!
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]