p.adj and logFC
1
0
Entering edit mode
Yisong Zhen ▴ 200
@yisong-zhen-2952
Last seen 7.4 years ago
Hello All, I used the following script to find the genes that both have p.adj < 0.05 and logFC < -1 in comparisons (TCdn - TCwt and Tcestw - TCwt). I checked one candidate gene in the normalized expression output (affy_My_data.txt). The first two are TCdn, middle two are TCwt and the last two are TCestw): MKG.56.34.1_at 4.30886639379254 5.33637926862047 11.8385942887500 10.9736438003031 4.22713527087133 3.28741332008267 It seems that this gene have same logFC in two comparisons (TCdn~ TCwt and TCets~TCwt). But the p.adj is very different: one is 0.053759(TCdn~TCwt) and the other is 0.009286 (TCetsw~TCwt). I am not familiar with LIMMA model and the code is simply from Biocoductor manual, please give some advice and tell me how to interpret this result.(How the p.adj is calculated? Why the same gene in two comparisons have same logFC but the p.adj is so different?) Thanks. Yisong library(limma) library(affy) targets<-readTargets("targets.txt") #targets; data<-ReadAffy(filenames=targets$FileName) eset<-rma(data) write.exprs(eset, file="affy_My_data.txt") design<-model.matrix(~-1+factor(c(1,1,2,2,3,3))) colnames(design)<-c("TCdn","TCwt","TCetsw") fit<-lmFit(eset,design) contrast.matrix<-makeContrasts(TCdn-TCwt,TCetsw-TCwt, levels=design) fit2<-contrasts.fit(fit, contrast.matrix) fit2<-eBayes(fit2) write.table(topTable(fit2, coef=1, adjust="fdr", sort.by="B", number=50000), file="limmadn_wt.xls", row.names=F, sep="\t") write.table(topTable(fit2, coef=2, adjust="fdr", sort.by="B", number=50000), file="limmaestw_wt.xls", row.names=F, sep="\t") [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
limma limma • 1.4k views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@james-w-macdonald-5106
Last seen 3 hours ago
United States
Hi Yisong, Yisong Zhen wrote: > Hello All, > I used the following script to find the genes that both have p.adj < 0.05 > and logFC < -1 in comparisons (TCdn - TCwt and Tcestw - TCwt). > I checked one candidate gene in the normalized expression output > (affy_My_data.txt). The first two are TCdn, middle two are TCwt and the last > two are TCestw): > > MKG.56.34.1_at 4.30886639379254 5.33637926862047 11.8385942887500 > 10.9736438003031 4.22713527087133 3.28741332008267 > > It seems that this gene have same logFC in two comparisons (TCdn~ TCwt and > TCets~TCwt). But the p.adj is very different: one is 0.053759(TCdn~TCwt) and > the other is 0.009286 (TCetsw~TCwt). > > I am not familiar with LIMMA model and the code is simply from Biocoductor > manual, please give some advice and tell me how to interpret this > result.(How the p.adj is calculated? Why the same gene in two comparisons > have same logFC but the p.adj is so different?) The reason you get a different p-value with the same log FC is because the p-value is based on the t-statistic, not the fold change (although the fold change is the numerator of that statistic). If you look at the t-statistics for these two genes you will see that they are different. Best, Jim > > Thanks. > > Yisong > > > > library(limma) > library(affy) > targets<-readTargets("targets.txt") > #targets; > data<-ReadAffy(filenames=targets$FileName) > eset<-rma(data) > write.exprs(eset, file="affy_My_data.txt") > design<-model.matrix(~-1+factor(c(1,1,2,2,3,3))) > colnames(design)<-c("TCdn","TCwt","TCetsw") > fit<-lmFit(eset,design) > contrast.matrix<-makeContrasts(TCdn-TCwt,TCetsw-TCwt, levels=design) > fit2<-contrasts.fit(fit, contrast.matrix) > fit2<-eBayes(fit2) > write.table(topTable(fit2, coef=1, adjust="fdr", sort.by="B", number=50000), > file="limmadn_wt.xls", row.names=F, sep="\t") > write.table(topTable(fit2, coef=2, adjust="fdr", sort.by="B", number=50000), > file="limmaestw_wt.xls", row.names=F, sep="\t") > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- James W. MacDonald, M.S. Biostatistician Hildebrandt Lab 8220D MSRB III 1150 W. Medical Center Drive Ann Arbor MI 48109-0646 734-936-8662
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:12 AM, James W. MacDonald <jmacdon@med.umich.edu>wrote: > Hi Yisong, > > Yisong Zhen wrote: > >> Hello All, >> I used the following script to find the genes that both have p.adj < 0.05 >> and logFC < -1 in comparisons (TCdn - TCwt and Tcestw - TCwt). >> I checked one candidate gene in the normalized expression output >> (affy_My_data.txt). The first two are TCdn, middle two are TCwt and the >> last >> two are TCestw): >> >> MKG.56.34.1_at 4.30886639379254 5.33637926862047 11.8385942887500 >> 10.9736438003031 4.22713527087133 3.28741332008267 >> >> It seems that this gene have same logFC in two comparisons (TCdn~ TCwt and >> TCets~TCwt). But the p.adj is very different: one is 0.053759(TCdn~TCwt) >> and >> the other is 0.009286 (TCetsw~TCwt). >> >> I am not familiar with LIMMA model and the code is simply from Biocoductor >> manual, please give some advice and tell me how to interpret this >> result.(How the p.adj is calculated? Why the same gene in two comparisons >> have same logFC but the p.adj is so different?) >> > > The reason you get a different p-value with the same log FC is because the > p-value is based on the t-statistic, not the fold change (although the fold > change is the numerator of that statistic). > > If you look at the t-statistics for these two genes you will see that they > are different. > And even if the t-statistics were identical, the adjustment method you have chosen ('fdr') is a function of a LIST of genes, and NOT the gene itself. For details, you can read the help for p.adjust(). Sean > > > > >> Thanks. >> >> Yisong >> >> >> >> library(limma) >> library(affy) >> targets<-readTargets("targets.txt") >> #targets; >> data<-ReadAffy(filenames=targets$FileName) >> eset<-rma(data) >> write.exprs(eset, file="affy_My_data.txt") >> design<-model.matrix(~-1+factor(c(1,1,2,2,3,3))) >> colnames(design)<-c("TCdn","TCwt","TCetsw") >> fit<-lmFit(eset,design) >> contrast.matrix<-makeContrasts(TCdn-TCwt,TCetsw-TCwt, levels=design) >> fit2<-contrasts.fit(fit, contrast.matrix) >> fit2<-eBayes(fit2) >> write.table(topTable(fit2, coef=1, adjust="fdr", sort.by="B", >> number=50000), >> file="limmadn_wt.xls", row.names=F, sep="\t") >> write.table(topTable(fit2, coef=2, adjust="fdr", sort.by="B", >> number=50000), >> file="limmaestw_wt.xls", row.names=F, sep="\t") >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioconductor mailing list >> Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >> Search the archives: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor >> > > -- > James W. MacDonald, M.S. > Biostatistician > Hildebrandt Lab > 8220D MSRB III > 1150 W. Medical Center Drive > Ann Arbor MI 48109-0646 > 734-936-8662 > > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 672 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6