normalized probes
1
0
Entering edit mode
Lana Schaffer ★ 1.3k
@lana-schaffer-1056
Last seen 10.3 years ago
Hi, I am wondering if it is possible to obtain the normalized probe values after quantile normalization. I have tried the option of using the destructive=F and then looked at the intensity matrix and found the values to be unchanged. I would like to know the different between the probe matrix and the intensity matrix. The index/order has been changed in the probe matrix from the intensity matrix and for my case the number of rows is reduced for the probe matrix. I will probably need to do the quantile normalization separate from RMA to get the probe intensity values? Lana Schaffer Biostatistics/Informatics The Scripps Research Institute DNA Array Core Facility La Jolla, CA 92037 (858) 784-2263 (858) 784-2994 schaffer at scripps.edu
Normalization probe Normalization probe • 682 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
@james-w-macdonald-5106
Last seen 1 day ago
United States
Hi Lana, > library(affy) > data(affybatch.example) > tmp <- normalize(affybatch.example) > all.equal(exprs(affybatch.example), exprs(tmp)) [1] "Mean relative difference: 0.1390075" > cbind(pm(affybatch.example, "A28102_at")[,1], pm(tmp, "A28102_at")[,1]) [,1] [,2] A28102_at1 149.0 132.0667 A28102_at2 143.5 127.3167 A28102_at3 132.0 115.8333 A28102_at4 130.0 113.7167 A28102_at5 115.8 100.3667 A28102_at6 131.0 114.4333 A28102_at7 131.8 115.4000 A28102_at8 140.0 123.6667 A28102_at9 122.0 106.3333 A28102_at10 133.3 117.2000 A28102_at11 136.0 120.1000 A28102_at12 123.0 107.3333 A28102_at13 132.5 116.5000 A28102_at14 130.0 113.7167 A28102_at15 125.0 109.0333 A28102_at16 133.5 117.3333 Best, Jim Lana Schaffer wrote: > Hi, > I am wondering if it is possible to obtain the > normalized probe values after quantile normalization. > I have tried the option of using the destructive=F > and then looked at the intensity matrix and found the > values to be unchanged. > I would like to know the different between the probe > matrix and the intensity matrix. The index/order > has been changed in the probe matrix from the intensity > matrix and for my case the number of rows is reduced > for the probe matrix. > I will probably need to do the quantile normalization > separate from RMA to get the probe intensity values? > > Lana Schaffer > Biostatistics/Informatics > The Scripps Research Institute > DNA Array Core Facility > La Jolla, CA 92037 > (858) 784-2263 > (858) 784-2994 > schaffer at scripps.edu > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor > Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor -- James W. MacDonald, M.S. Biostatistician Affymetrix and cDNA Microarray Core University of Michigan Cancer Center 1500 E. Medical Center Drive 7410 CCGC Ann Arbor MI 48109 734-647-5623
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 866 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6