Hi,
I am analyzing two Illumina Beadarray samples and there is around 34%
probesets which
are of negative expression values. Which package, like lumi or
BeadArray or else could be
more suitable to normalize the data?
Thanks a lot!
Sincerely,
Allen
On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray
> facility folks and they told me that they did background
> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio.
> Should we also skip the background subtraction step?
The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I
believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The choice to
opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio, I
think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not it is
warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not. Perhaps
others will have strong opinions one way or the other.
Sean
You will get negative expression values if your data are global
background
corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of datasets:
(1)
Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background corrected
and
normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control profile
output from BeadStudio.
Wei
> On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote:
>> Hi Sean,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray
>> facility folks and they told me that they did background
>> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio.
>> Should we also skip the background subtraction step?
>
> The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I
> believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The choice
to
> opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio, I
> think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not it
is
> warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not. Perhaps
> others will have strong opinions one way or the other.
>
> Sean
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives:
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>
Dear Wei,
Thanks a lot for the notes. We have also figured out by the help
of Illumina experts that the negative expression values were generated
by background subtraction.
Our facility used the BeadStudio to do background subtraction and
normalization steps. The only concern I have is that we often see,
for a probset, it perhaps has positive value for control sample while
negative value for the test sample, or the opposite. For this
scenario,
I do not know how to deal with.
Have you also done the analysis starting with the dataset1 you
mentioned?
Will that make a difference?
We will also obtain the raw dataset without background subtraction and
see how it will look like.
Thanks once again!
Allen
On Nov 11, 2007 7:13 AM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote:
> You will get negative expression values if your data are global
background
> corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of
datasets: (1)
> Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background corrected
and
> normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control
profile
> output from BeadStudio.
>
> Wei
>
>
> > On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote:
> >> Hi Sean,
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray
> >> facility folks and they told me that they did background
> >> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio.
> >> Should we also skip the background subtraction step?
> >
> > The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I
> > believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The
choice to
> > opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio,
I
> > think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not
it is
> > warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not.
Perhaps
> > others will have strong opinions one way or the other.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioconductor mailing list
> > Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> > Search the archives:
> > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
> >
>
>
>
Dear Allen:
We always work on the data set which are not background corrected
and normalized. There are no negative expression values in this data
set.
Cheers,
Wei
affy snp wrote:
> Dear Wei,
>
> Thanks a lot for the notes. We have also figured out by the help
> of Illumina experts that the negative expression values were
generated
> by background subtraction.
>
> Our facility used the BeadStudio to do background subtraction and
> normalization steps. The only concern I have is that we often see,
> for a probset, it perhaps has positive value for control sample
while
> negative value for the test sample, or the opposite. For this
scenario,
> I do not know how to deal with.
>
> Have you also done the analysis starting with the dataset1 you
mentioned?
> Will that make a difference?
>
> We will also obtain the raw dataset without background subtraction
and
> see how it will look like.
>
> Thanks once again!
>
> Allen
>
> On Nov 11, 2007 7:13 AM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote:
>
>> You will get negative expression values if your data are global
background
>> corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of
datasets: (1)
>> Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background
corrected and
>> normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control
profile
>> output from BeadStudio.
>>
>> Wei
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sean,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray
>>>> facility folks and they told me that they did background
>>>> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio.
>>>> Should we also skip the background subtraction step?
>>>>
>>> The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I
>>> believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The
choice to
>>> opt out of background correction is relatively new in BeadStudio,
I
>>> think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not
it is
>>> warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not.
Perhaps
>>> others will have strong opinions one way or the other.
>>>
>>> Sean
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Bioconductor mailing list
>>> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>>> Search the archives:
>>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Thanks Wei. Fairly enough. I guess I will run to our microarray
facility
tomorrow to request the slides re-scanned. BTW, I guess you are using
Lumi or Beadarray for normalization step?
Regards,
Allen
On Nov 11, 2007 5:28 PM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote:
> Dear Allen:
>
> We always work on the data set which are not background
corrected
> and normalized. There are no negative expression values in this data
set.
>
> Cheers,
> Wei
>
>
> affy snp wrote:
> > Dear Wei,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the notes. We have also figured out by the help
> > of Illumina experts that the negative expression values were
generated
> > by background subtraction.
> >
> > Our facility used the BeadStudio to do background subtraction and
> > normalization steps. The only concern I have is that we often see,
> > for a probset, it perhaps has positive value for control sample
while
> > negative value for the test sample, or the opposite. For this
scenario,
> > I do not know how to deal with.
> >
> > Have you also done the analysis starting with the dataset1 you
mentioned?
> > Will that make a difference?
> >
> > We will also obtain the raw dataset without background subtraction
and
> > see how it will look like.
> >
> > Thanks once again!
> >
> > Allen
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2007 7:13 AM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote:
> >
> >> You will get negative expression values if your data are global
background
> >> corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of
datasets: (1)
> >> Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background
corrected and
> >> normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control
profile
> >> output from BeadStudio.
> >>
> >> Wei
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Sean,
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray
> >>>> facility folks and they told me that they did background
> >>>> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio.
> >>>> Should we also skip the background subtraction step?
> >>>>
> >>> The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I
> >>> believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The
choice to
> >>> opt out of background correction is relatively new in
BeadStudio, I
> >>> think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not
it is
> >>> warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not.
Perhaps
> >>> others will have strong opinions one way or the other.
> >>>
> >>> Sean
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Bioconductor mailing list
> >>> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> >>> Search the archives:
> >>>
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
Yes, we are using Lumi VST to do the data transformation at this
stage.
Good luck,
Wei
affy snp wrote:
> Thanks Wei. Fairly enough. I guess I will run to our microarray
facility
> tomorrow to request the slides re-scanned. BTW, I guess you are
using
> Lumi or Beadarray for normalization step?
>
> Regards,
> Allen
>
> On Nov 11, 2007 5:28 PM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote:
>
>> Dear Allen:
>>
>> We always work on the data set which are not background
corrected
>> and normalized. There are no negative expression values in this
data set.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wei
>>
>>
>> affy snp wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Wei,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the notes. We have also figured out by the help
>>> of Illumina experts that the negative expression values were
generated
>>> by background subtraction.
>>>
>>> Our facility used the BeadStudio to do background subtraction and
>>> normalization steps. The only concern I have is that we often see,
>>> for a probset, it perhaps has positive value for control sample
while
>>> negative value for the test sample, or the opposite. For this
scenario,
>>> I do not know how to deal with.
>>>
>>> Have you also done the analysis starting with the dataset1 you
mentioned?
>>> Will that make a difference?
>>>
>>> We will also obtain the raw dataset without background subtraction
and
>>> see how it will look like.
>>>
>>> Thanks once again!
>>>
>>> Allen
>>>
>>> On Nov 11, 2007 7:13 AM, Wei Shi <shi at="" wehi.edu.au=""> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You will get negative expression values if your data are global
background
>>>> corrected. Our microarray facility core creates two types of
datasets: (1)
>>>> Not background corrected and normalized and (2) background
corrected and
>>>> normalized. Background values can be seen in the probe control
profile
>>>> output from BeadStudio.
>>>>
>>>> Wei
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 9, 2007 11:02 AM, affy snp <affysnp at="" gmail.com=""> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Sean,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot for the suggestion. I checked with our microarray
>>>>>> facility folks and they told me that they did background
>>>>>> subtraction and then normalized the data in BeadStudio.
>>>>>> Should we also skip the background subtraction step?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The negative values are generated by the normalization step, I
>>>>> believe. So, you can do background subtraction or not. The
choice to
>>>>> opt out of background correction is relatively new in
BeadStudio, I
>>>>> think, so I do not have a systematic answer as to whether or not
it is
>>>>> warranted to use BeadStudio background subtraction or not.
Perhaps
>>>>> others will have strong opinions one way or the other.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sean
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Bioconductor mailing list
>>>>> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>>>>> Search the archives:
>>>>>
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>