Preferred RDBMS
1
0
Entering edit mode
@steven-wanyee-2150
Last seen 10.2 years ago
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20070529/ b7ba8e3a/attachment.pl
• 782 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Marc Saric ▴ 70
@marc-saric-1645
Last seen 5.2 years ago
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steven Wanyee wrote: > I want to develop a database for importing and storing FCS data files from > our flow lab, and to then use the db with bioconductor tools. And I was just > curious as to which rdbms seems is preferred. If you want to stick to open source tools, either MySQL or PostgreSQL should do fine. Both run on all relevant platforms and should be fast enough for most tasks. PostgreSQL is the more feature rich one, while MySQL might be a bit faster in some cases. Other databases might be ok too, but they are not used as wide-spread as those two. - -- Kind regards, Marc Saric -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGXCMmvKxJUF29wRIRAr2PAJwKDI5wLAnO8t4KvqDb/h0DTFnDHQCgsUNP JemhVgToqYnC7ok0FmZOOuE= =wj9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 647 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6