is it a good idea not to consider low-intensity probesets in analysis?
0
0
Entering edit mode
Weiwei Shi ★ 1.2k
@weiwei-shi-1407
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Dear gurus: Sorry for this off-topic question. I am thinking if it is a good idea to remove low-intensity probesets of affymetrix. For example, the following is a part of summary of log2 intensity from the u133a probesets across 81 samples: 1007_s_at 1053_at 117_at 121_at Min. : 5.966 Min. :4.635 Min. :2.925 Min. :2.466 1st Qu.: 8.194 1st Qu.:5.366 1st Qu.:3.381 1st Qu.:2.553 Median : 8.873 Median :5.570 Median :3.509 Median :2.604 Mean : 8.824 Mean :5.639 Mean :3.816 Mean :2.801 3rd Qu.: 9.522 3rd Qu.:5.898 3rd Qu.:3.919 3rd Qu.:2.860 Max. :11.132 Max. :7.094 Max. :6.650 Max. :3.828 My question is, does it make sense to remove the probeset 121_at for its max(log2 intensity) is only 3.828? thanks, -- Weiwei Shi, Ph.D Research Scientist GeneGO, Inc. "Did you always know?" "No, I did not. But I believed..." ---Matrix III
• 752 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 706 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6