The help page of "expresso" mentions that the li and wong summary method will not get the same results as that from dChip. I would like to know how different or similar they are. Thanks a lot for your help.

i can not quantify the differnce, but i can say that when the bioconducotor version was written it was done following Li and Wong's PNAS paper (with some help from Cheng Li with respect to the defaults). It was not written to try to reproduce dChip (which is free for academics but not open source) On Thu, 29 May 2003 Qi.Zhang@astrazeneca.com wrote: > The help page of "expresso" mentions that the li and wong summary method > will not get the same results as that from dChip. I would like to know how > different or similar they are. Thanks a lot for your help. > > _______________________________________________ > Bioconductor mailing list > Bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch > https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor >