Entering edit mode
nia
▴
30
@nia-12707
Last seen 4.7 years ago
Hi everyone,
I have write a script to analyze microarray illumina data by using Limma package. The script generated a table and it consist a logFC column. Now, I wish to know the FC values but here I have a confusion that should I go with 2^logFC
or 10^logFC
. I am looking for help.
Thankyou for the quick response, that means I have to go with
2^logFC
.Yes.
Alternatively, you can use
sign(logFC)*2^abs(logFC)
which has some symmetrical properties.For a logFC of
-3
, instead of getting2^-3 = 1/8 = 0.125
, you get-8
.Here you have to interpret
-x
as1/x
. This could help. Of course, there is no in]-1:1[
.Very detailed information thank you. The point I learn is if I do
2^logFC
then I have to interpret that -logfc as 1/-logfc.No I understand what you mean. Here is what I mean:
If logFC = 3, then FC = 2^3 = 8
If logFC = -3, then FC = 2^-3 = 1/8 that can also be noted -8 using the convention that -x means 1/x
I can't help but feel that this notation causes more problems than it solves; having the magnitude of the fold-change and the sign of the log-fold change is begging to be mistaken for one or the other. Certainly, if I saw a negative "fold change" in an analysis report, I would assume that the author made a typo and actually meant "log-fold change".
If one finds log-values or fold-changes below 1 too difficult to comprehend, a more mathematically appropriate notation would be to state
1/x
rather than-x
, wherex = 2^abs(logFC)
forlogFC < 0
. Then you get the magnitude of the fold change without repurposing the minus symbol to represent something other than its intended meaning.