WGCNA gene significance and module membership
1
0
Entering edit mode
VictoriaL • 0
@victorial-22345
Last seen 3.8 years ago

I am completing WGCNA on RNAseq data for 3 groups of patients disease responders, non-responders and controls. I am using signed network and have generated a module- trait association table with the modules. I have some modules with a positive PCC (red) and some with a negative PCC (green). I have plotted the modules of interest using Gene Significance and Module Membership and review p values and correlation.

Some of the genes within these modules come out with high -ve GS and some with high +ve GM, likewise same with MM, both high -ve and high +ve, and pathways they form looking at GO are highly plausible with the disease of interest. How do I interpret both +ve and -ve GS and +ve & -ve MM within the same module? I have read online tutorials and youtube videos from authors of programme but cannot find the answers to explain. If anyone knows where I can find this info would greatly appreciate it.

WGCNA R • 5.4k views
ADD COMMENT
3
Entering edit mode
@peter-langfelder-4469
Last seen 4 weeks ago
United States

With signed networks, you should not have genes with (strong) negative module membership. Weak negative MM can sometimes happen because topological overlap can connect nodes that have zero adjacencies but this is also not entirely common. Can you post your code (the call to blockwiseModules, if you used that)?

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

net = blockwiseModules(Cell_4, power=4, maxBlockSize = 13400, TOMType = "signed", minModuleSize=30, reassignThreshold =0, mergeCutHeight = 0.25, numericLabels = TRUE, pamRespectsDendro = FALSE, saveTOMs = TRUE, saveTOMFileBase = "PBCreponseTOMB", verbose= 3)

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Your code uses "signed TOM" but an unsigned network. To construct a signed network, you should use argument

networkType = "signed"

I also recommend doubling the soft thresholding power; alternatively, you can use

networkType = "signed hybrid"

and keep the power as it is. The results will be very similar. The confusion between signed network and signed TOM is very common; blame the author (i.e. me) for using confusing terminology. If you want to learn more about what signed TOM does, you can read this technical report.

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you kindly for your reply! I will try repeating the code tonight and hopefully it will sort the problem. Thank you kindly Victoria

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

**UPDATE!! I checked my code and there was an error (using an R object from the unsigned network). Fixed it, and now there are no negative values. So if anyone is reading this and has a similar issue, check your code first :)

Hello! I have a similar question. I created a signed network but am noticing negative -MM associated with the module (some are quite strong at -0.7). I made sure to include networkType = "signed" in my code:

net = blockwiseModules(dat.Expr0, power = 14, TOMType = "signed", minModuleSize = 30, networkType = "signed", reassignThreshold = 0, mergeCutHeight = 0.25, numericLabels = TRUE, pamRespectsDendro = FALSE, saveTOMs = TRUE, saveTOMFileBase = "ffTOM", verbose = 3, maxBlochSize=10000)

This was my code to identify module membership: datKME=signedKME(dat.Expr0, moduleEigengenes, outputColumnName="MM.")

Please let me know why there might be genes with negative and positive module memberships. Thank you!!

ADD REPLY
0
Entering edit mode

Do you have negative kME in the module the gene is assigned to, or in a different module? signedKME computes kME of all genes to all modules, not just the assigned module for each gene.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 491 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6