paired t test for siblings?
1
0
Entering edit mode
@liqinghongstlouismolecular-biology-1463
Last seen 10.1 years ago
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/attachments/20051107/ f8287b34/attachment.pl
• 582 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
Naomi Altman ★ 6.0k
@naomi-altman-380
Last seen 3.5 years ago
United States
I would use Limma, with sib pairs as a block. This has all the advantages of a paired t-test with better power. At 12:53 PM 11/7/2005, Li,Qinghong,ST.LOUIS,Molecular Biology wrote: >Hi BioC, > >I have a data set from an experiemnt that has a control and a >treatment group for a total of 8 dogs. Each group has 4 bioloigical >replicates (4 dogs). Animals are in pairs in terms of siblings. Is >paired test appropriate in this case? > >Due to low replicate number (4), is traditional t test appropriate? >If not, what would be other options in BioC packages besides SAM? > >Thanks in advance! >Johnny > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > >_______________________________________________ >Bioconductor mailing list >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor Naomi S. Altman 814-865-3791 (voice) Associate Professor Dept. of Statistics 814-863-7114 (fax) Penn State University 814-865-1348 (Statistics) University Park, PA 16802-2111
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 564 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6