Entering edit mode
Wang, Hui
▴
170
@wang-hui-219
Last seen 10.2 years ago
Dear list,
It turned out the slowness and out of memory has nothing to do with
bioconductor package.
I tested it by the following:
test.intensity <- test@exprs #where test.intensity is a 0.5 miliion x
5
matrix
plot(data.frame(test.intenisty)) # scatter plot for replicate
comparison.
it took >10 mins after I increased the memory size. (I was running the
window version of R). As you can see that have nothing to do with
biocondunctor package.
Best regards
-h
-----Original Message-----
From: Wang, Hui
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 1:35 PM
To: bioconductor@stat.math.ethz.ch
Subject: pm or mm methods for AffyBatch object
Hi List,
I have two questions:
1)
I have a chip which is the same feature as u133A, however have much
less mm
probes. When using pm or mm method, the matrices have the same
dimension. I
wonder, do the methods assume the number of probes for pm or mm are
the
sames by default? How do you determine pm or mm probes?
2)
The cdf I am using is the same size as u133A(I wish I could contribute
my
cdf), I only read in 5 chips. However running into memory problem
quickly.
For example, I did a boxplot on 5 chips, it gave memory error (I
allocated
1G) after 10mins of plotting.
Could somebody give me some tips besides breaking down the files
(since I
only have 5 files)?
Best regards
-h
[[alternate HTML version deleted]]